MODEL COMPARISON

GPT Image 2 vs Seedream 4.0: Which One Should You Use

The site has 429 and 21 reproducible cases for each, respectively. Below, we compare strengths, prompt writing, and final results side by side.

The Bottom Line

GPT Image 2 is better for Conversational, iterative editing; Seedream 4.0 is better for Native Chinese prompt comprehension. Running the same idea through both is usually worth it — they "listen" differently, so the prompt has to be adjusted to match.

Strengths & Prompt-Writing Comparison

GPT Image 2

Conversational, iterative editingUnderstanding of natural-language descriptionsPhoto stylization & local replacementChinese prompts work directly

It responds better to conversational descriptions than to stacks of parameter keywords. When editing an image, saying "change the background to…" is more efficient than rewriting the whole prompt.

Seedream 4.0

Native Chinese prompt comprehensionProduct and still-life photographyEveryday scenes and festive subjectsSteady composition and color

Write in Chinese directly. Naming concrete materials and light directions (frosted glass, side backlight, linen weave) works far better than adjectives like "premium feel".