MODEL COMPARISON

GPT Image 2 vs Seedream 4.5: Which One Should You Use

The site has 429 and 15 reproducible cases for each, respectively. Below, we compare strengths, prompt writing, and final results side by side.

The Bottom Line

GPT Image 2 is better for Conversational, iterative editing; Seedream 4.5 is better for In-image text and headline layout. Running the same idea through both is usually worth it — they "listen" differently, so the prompt has to be adjusted to match.

Strengths & Prompt-Writing Comparison

GPT Image 2

Conversational, iterative editingUnderstanding of natural-language descriptionsPhoto stylization & local replacementChinese prompts work directly

It responds better to conversational descriptions than to stacks of parameter keywords. When editing an image, saying "change the background to…" is more efficient than rewriting the whole prompt.

Seedream 4.5

In-image text and headline layoutHolding subject, light and tone through editsFast batch generationE-commerce and poster layouts

When text must appear in the picture, quote the exact wording and specify position, size and weight. Phrase edit instructions as "keep A, replace only B" for the most reliable result.