MODEL COMPARISON
DALL-E vs GPT Image 2.5：同一个需求该用哪个
站内两边分别有 23 组和 254 组可复现案例。下面从擅长场景、提示词写法到实际成图逐项对照。
一句话结论
DALL-E 更适合Friendly to natural-language descriptions；GPT Image 2.5 更适合Executing long paragraph-length scene descriptions。同一个想法在两边各跑一次往往更划算——它们"听话的方式"不一样，提示词的写法也要跟着调。
擅长场景与写法对照
DALL-E
Writing full sentences, as if describing a painting, works better than stacking keywords. When you want a specific style, describe the feeling you're after rather than listing style jargon.
GPT Image 2.5
Split the frame into four blocks - subject, environment, light, camera - and write each separately; that works far better than piling on style words. It is also more reliable than the previous version at local edits phrased as "change only this one thing, leave the rest alone".
DALL-E 的案例
Long-Exposure Streaks from Hovering City Traffic
Dim Light, a Secret She Isn't Telling
Detective's Office, Light and Shadow Cut Straight from the Past
Rainbow Eyes Beneath a Crimson Scarf
Neon Alley Chase, Frozen Mid-Turn
This Castle Diagram Is Built for Journal CollageGPT Image 2.5 的案例
An Astronomical Clock Opens Its Brass Mechanism on a Midnight Restoration Bench
Morning Mist and Indigo Pulp Fill a Quiet Handmade-Paper Workshop at Dawn
Beside a Rainy Library Window, a Quiet Profile Keeps a Little Distance
Amber Lacquer Slowly Brings a Wooden Phoenix's Feathers Into the Light
A Colossal Archive Stairway Leads Upward Into the Thin Mist of Dawn
Rain Falls on Kyoto While a Tea Map Waits Inside the Wooden Window